Review in Q magazine today?

Albums, singles, songs and general Wildhearts banter
Forum rules
Divvn't be a twat

Postby Baby Chaos » 2nd May 07, 21:47

Ean wrote:Cracking analysis? Or poor judgement? Over Endless Nameless? I can't imagine anybody's ever going to come up with an answer to that... :lol:


That's a very fair point! :D
Baby Chaos
 
Posts: 14
Joined: 21st Feb 06, 02:23
Location: Whitley Bay

Postby Ben Wright » 2nd May 07, 22:24

Can someone write into Q to say their review is totally wrong?

Newcastle goon rockers?

That's wrong seeing as there's one Brummie, one Londoner, a Yank and a sand dancer. At least if you're going to write a review panning something Q, get your fucking facts right. And they pay these people to write for a living? With mistakes like that, I thank god they're not doctors.

"Sorry Mr Jones, we were supposed to put your leg in plaster, but we accidently amputated your toes by mistake....."
Image
Ben Wright
 
Posts: 214
Joined: 23rd Nov 06, 15:03
Location: Swansea

Postby Best In Me » 3rd May 07, 00:37

Well Guns N' Roses were an LA band even though they were all born elsewhere. It's not where you were born that defines a band.
Best In Me
 
Posts: 5
Joined: 28th Apr 07, 23:49

Postby WiredOut » 3rd May 07, 00:57

Ben Wright wrote:Can someone write into Q to say their review is totally wrong?

Newcastle goon rockers?

That's wrong seeing as there's one Brummie, one Londoner, a Yank and a sand dancer. At least if you're going to write a review panning something Q, get your fucking facts right. And they pay these people to write for a living? With mistakes like that, I thank god they're not doctors.

"Sorry Mr Jones, we were supposed to put your leg in plaster, but we accidently amputated your toes by mistake....."


Goon rockers? That's quite funny, at least. It also indicates that perhaps the reviewer had prejudged the album based on a previous disliking of the band, which may well be based as much on their previous antics as the music.

I remember the '...Strikes Back' review a while ago in Q called them something like 'pretend metallers clad in TK Maxx denim,' or something. Also amusing in a way, but hinting at an outright disdain for the band themselves. Same fellow, possibly?

I also recall James Oldham calling the Wildies 'vomit rockers' in a Yo-Yos NME single review. He hates them. It was him what gave 'FFL '96' 4/10 in the NME, too. Works for Uncut now, I think....the plot thickens.

But what kind of crazy gonzoid punk metal pop'n'roll band would you be if you couldn't piss some people off? :)
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
WiredOut
 
Posts: 320
Joined: 26th Mar 06, 05:01
Location: no coitaL

Postby Ben Wright » 3rd May 07, 02:03

Best In Me wrote:Well Guns N' Roses were an LA band even though they were all born elsewhere. It's not where you were born that defines a band.


Although Guns N Roses did live in LA and were also part of the LA sleaze rock scene if I recall.

True, the band did write a song called Geordie in Wonderland and have had members from Newcastle in previous incarnations, but that's wrong for the magazine to say that to the Wildhearts 2007. Ultimately, I thought it was lazy journalism on the part of Q. If it was a fan mistake or an independent webzine it wouldn't bother me, but the fact these guys are paid critics and they can't be factually correct is beyond me.

However, I suppose their endless lists must take up a lot of hours.........

On a similar note god bless www.nufc.com for taking the p*ss out of sport journos mistakes. Class!
Image
Ben Wright
 
Posts: 214
Joined: 23rd Nov 06, 15:03
Location: Swansea

Previous

Return to Wildhearts Music and General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

cron