Ean wrote:Chris Norway wrote:Andy wrote:Well if its good enough for Metallica to do. Then it's good enough for WH I say.
No way! Metallica have overdone the cover-thing because the needed to, and when they released that double cover CD it was very clear that the bands songwriting idea was running dry around that time. Its´a weakness that the best stuff Metallica have done the last billion years are songs written by others.
Wildhearts ar a much better, more original and better songwriting band than Metallica will ever be. Unlike Metallica, Wildhearts will never
need to do a cover album. So unless Ginger and CJ have run
completly dry of ideas, than I dont understand this release. And, for me personally its much more interesting with an album of Wildhearts original tracks than the Wildhearts fooling around with some old music.
I guess it would be an ok idea for Ginger to do it as a solo thing or Silver Ginger or Sonic Circus or.... But its my
strong point of view that an orginal and colorful songwriting force like The Wildhearts should
never do a cover album.
BTW: Ginger could fart a better Metallica album than Hetfield/Ullrich could come up with in 5 years. IMO.

Over to you then, Seventieslord...

Just saw this now....I don't have much to say... here's my take:
Songwriting:
Wildhearts: 10, Metallica 9.
Edge, Wildhearts.
Heaviness:
Metallica 10, Wildhearts 9
Edge, Metallica.
Musical Talent:
Metallica 10, Wildhearts 8
Edge, Metallica.
Riffs (quality and quantity):
Metallica 10, Wildhearts 10
Draw.
Song Composition:
Metallica 10, Wildhearts 9
Edge, Metallica.
Diversity:
Wildhearts 10, Metallica 8
Edge, Wildhearts.
Honesty: (career average)
Wildhearts 10, Metallica 8
Edge, Wildhearts.
3 for Metallica, 3 for The Wildhearts, one draw. It's a tight race with me. For now, let me just say I have "co-favourites" because it's very difficult to pick just one or the other. These are two bands who excel in many areas, but have different advantages over eachother.
The original poster makes it sound like Metallica is rubbish compared to The Wildhearts. Nothing could be further from the truth. Say what you will about them now, but from 1984-1990 they reached heights musically (and commercially, obviously) that the Wildhearts have only approached. The Wildhearts have remained fresh, original, and interesting, while many have lost interest in Metallica, probably rightfully so. But you can't pretend Metallica's first 4 albums never happened. They did. And they were something to behold.
And to clarify, the double covers album was actually just a disc of new material. The rest was a "tie up the loose ends" disc featuring all the covers they did from 1986-1995. So to say they recorded two discs of covers because they were out of ideas for songs is highly unfair and an exaggeration.
Every good band ends up doing it eventually. And I'm just happy there's a new Wildhearts release coming out. They're keeping busy, and I'm sure it will lead to a new studio album in the near future, and I'm sure it will be better than St. Anger.