by hansblix » 14th Jun 07, 14:37
to say that scott simplifies dannys basslines just to be more energetic onstage is daft, by that presumption, danny's lack of stage presence is due to his technical basslines?? dont think so, watch any live video pre-95 dannys got awesome energy, after that, well, its pretty clear that the drugs/knee injuries have took effect.
scott's got some great basslines on the new album, and its obvious that he writes really well with the rest of the band because he actually has bass lines rather than choosing the simple option of just following what the guitars are doing...
i agree the fans love danny, but i prefer scott, sure you could romaticise things by saying danny's the 'sid vicious' of the wildhearts but anyone with half a brain can identify that aint a good thing!
danny will always be valued and respected amongst wildhearts fans as he a fantastic down to earth bloke who helped - in a huge way - make the wildhearts what they were... but it aint the 70's anymore, if bands (especially bands who've been there and done it like the WH) want to be successful (rather than infamous) nowadays IMO having members who aint a liability and can deliver tight energetic performances (like scott does) is an integral asset.
how many of us on this board prefer seeing a kick ass wildhearts show (kudos to ritch and scott) than the lacklustre performance/whats gonna happen/go wrong next scenario??
Music's all that'll ever get through